docs: design review and bench reliability analysis

Browse Source

design-review.html is the gameplay and UI read on the shipped campaign, with
boards rendered from the repo's own geometry rather than redrawn.

bench-reliability.html asks which of the bench's numbers are worth acting on,
and answers it by running the same 18 levels twice under identical conditions.
The mechanical rotation counters reproduce (r = 0.82-0.92) and three different
models agree on them level for level, so they measure the level rather than
the player — a 12-second rule-bot sweep gets the same answer as hours of
model time. Difficulty and stuck ratings also hold up (r = 0.93 / 0.85), but
the ratings for rotation, clarity and fun do not (0.32 / 0.19 / 0.56): asking
a model whether rotation matters is noise, while counting blind rotations is
not.

Every figure is computed from bench/runs by build-bench-report.mjs; nothing in
the page is hand-written, so it can be regenerated as runs accumulate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

...

This commit is contained in:

cabinw

2026-09-14 14:00:33 +08:00

co-authored by Claude Opus 5

parent 643cba0ed9

commit 752b437078

4 changed files with 2056 additions and 0 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

docs/design-review.html

+1121

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long