c50b is sealed where it stands, as a reference sample rather than a candidate.
Its packed construction was judged good — clearing a board from the rim inward
is the experience it proved out — but at 32 of 50 levels it played as one level
fifty times: 体验太单一了，因为基本都是满盘. The note on why it is kept lives at
the top of its module, because the lesson is the useful part.
It was monotonous on a second axis nobody asked about. 环绕 and 花瓣, the two
route families the brief singles out as the good-looking ones, were absent from
it entirely — not by choice but by a crossing threshold. At 1.0 crossings per
cell, 0% of orbits boards pass and 4% of spirals; at 1.2, 84% and 94% do. The
gate meant to answer "交叉点太多" had quietly deleted the families most worth
looking at, so it moves to 1.2 — still half the 2.36 that drew the complaint.
c50c alternates five kinds of level every three to five: packed boards down to
32%, long-route departures to watch, deep locks to solve, small quick boards,
and segments given over to orbits, petals and spirals by name. All six families
appear, no family exceeds 24%, and the plan is 13 segments rather than 9.
Selection learned to ask for variety outright — by family, piece count and
longest drawn route — instead of hoping it falls out of a difficulty score.
Rule bot across all three: 50/50 cleared and zero dead taps everywhere; c50c
sits between the other two on blind rotations and on how much there is to do.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The game has never had a board you simply clear out, and the request for one
turned out to need a construction of its own rather than a denser deep lock.
Filling cells at random can never work: a packed board has nothing that can
move — measured over forty random fills of a 37-cell board, zero pieces free in
all six orientations, every time, because a piece steps to the next cell before
it can leave and on a full board that cell is taken.
So packBoard builds backwards. Start empty, add only a piece that could leave
right now, and the placement order reversed is a removal order — solvability
becomes a property of the construction. Which cell to fill next decides
everything: at random it stalls near half, while filling the most constrained
cell first takes a 19-cell interior to 96% and fills it outright.
The rim is deliberately empty. Those pieces leave first and ask nothing, and
clearing from the rim inward gives a packed board its own difficulty curve
inside one level — the outer cells read easily, and it tightens as it opens.
Two things were tried against the ceiling and failed, and are recorded as such:
depth-first backtracking made it worse on both counts (65-78% filled against
greedy's 89%, at 2000-3000 seconds a board) because recomputing every cell's
legal directions per node spends the budget three levels deep. And the audit's
dead-turn gate could not be trusted here at all — on a packed board its breadth
search truncates, so it certified levels the rule bot then walked through three
blind turns in a row. The pool is filtered by playing it instead: a full pass
takes one second and does not lie.
The campaign is 32 packed levels to 18 deep locks, alternating, with the closing
six at a completely full interior. Same rule bot, both editions: worst blind
streak 1 either way, dead taps zero, and half again as much to do per level.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Opening the c50 edition threw `campaign.legacyStorageKeys is not iterable`
and left the board blank — the header still drew, so the level set looked
loaded. Every other edition carries the array; the hand-written c50 entry
did not, and 197 passing tests had nothing to say about it, because nothing
tested the registration itself.
The test now walks every edition and asserts the shape app.js relies on,
including that the chapter list can actually hold the levels. It fails on the
entry as it shipped.
The task board was reading levels/prototypes/d5.json while the campaign sat in
levels/campaign-50.json, so it showed "候选关卡 18 / 50" with fifty levels
built. It reads the shipping set when there is one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The deep-lock construction cannot go below three turns, so it cannot supply an
opening band — every level it makes lands mid-difficulty and the curve comes
out flat. harvest-easy pulls the shallow end from the shipped v0.5 set, but
only the 3% of it that holds up: 568 of 1000 need no rotation at all and 51
more are clearable by tapping at random, which is what the monkey threshold is
for. 33 levels survive, at one and two turns.
select-50 scores candidates on mechanical features only, spreads the pick
evenly across that range, and caps any one route grammar at 36% so the campaign
cannot quietly become one template repeated — the shipped 1000 turned out to be
thirty. Weights are a flag, so refitting them from a round of agent ratings is
a re-run rather than an edit.
The result is a curve rather than a plateau: difficulty score 3.85 / 6.24 /
7.60 across the three bands, rotations 1.8 / 3.0 / 3.5, and every level keeps
three or more opening choices with a show of at least a second.
The 50 register as a playable campaign edition, so review happens in the real
game; docs/review-50.html is the handover sheet, one card per level with the
opening position drawn from the solver rather than sketched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Restore v0.1 and v0.2 archives with separate progress, publish the curved v0.3 campaign, and document the original 24-level design with reproducible evidence. Refine board presentation and movement, and keep video lab tooling within its own directory.
